Kenyataan Presiden Majlis Peguam Malaysia berhubung pembatalan perarakan hak asasi

Dipetik dari blog Publius Melayu

Presiden Majlis Peguam lebih rela membatalkan rancangan perarakan hak asasi pada Ahad 9 Disember ini daripada memohon permit.

Jika Majlis Peguam memohon permit, tindakan permohonan itu sendiri akan menunjukkan Majlis Peguam bersetuju bahawa hak asasi hanya boleh di amalkan di Malaysias tertakluk kepada kebenaran daripada pihak berkuasa. Ini, menurut mereka, bukanlah definisi hak asasi yang di pegang Majlis Peguam.

Komen blogger: Betul ke majoriti peguam berfikiran begitu? AGM Bar Council dihadiri hanya oleh segelintir peguam. Apakah ini perangainya orang yang angkuh dengan kelulusan undang-undang? Yang peliknya, apakah mereka tidak memahami bahawa undang-undang dibuat oleh wakil rakyat. Kalau tidak oleh wakil rakyat oleh siapa? Mana boleh kita kumpulkan 27 juta orang di satu lokasi dan berbincang hal penggubalan undang-undang? Tak praktikal! Patut lah orang Melayu mengilhamkan istilah LAWYER BURUK! Golongan orang seperti inilah yang begitu taksub dengan pemikiran bahawa undang-undang buatan manusia mengatasi undang-undang tuhan.

PERMINTAAN & DESAKAN HINDRAF dan realiti

Dari blog Publius Melayu

Permintaan-permintaan HINDRAF

Berikut ialah permintaan asal mereka:

1. Pembayaran gantirugi sebanyak £1 juta daripada kerajaan Britain untuk tiap seorang rakyat Indian Malaysia.
   
2. Hentikan apa yang mereka dakwa sebagai pembinasaan sengaja kuil-kuil Hindu. Pembayaran ganti rugi sebanyak RM10 juta bagi setiap satu.
   
3. Hak sama dalam pendidikan dan pekerjaan
   
4. Tambahan bantuan kepada 523 buah sekolah Tamil
   

Permintaan-permintaan baru HINDRAF

1. Perjumpaan dengan Perdana Menteri Dato' Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Ahad ini.
   
2. Penubuhan sebuah jawatankuasa baru bagi membantu menangani masalah-masalah yang dihadapi kaum India.
   
3. Desakan supaya dibebaskan kesemua tahanan berbangsa India dari sebuah penjara di Johor.
   
4. Perlantikan seorang yang bukan Melayu sebagai Timbalan Perdana Menteri.
   
5. Jawatan Menteri Kewangan diberikan kepada seorang Cina.
   
6. 20 peratus daripada kesemua jawatan tertinggi dalam kerajaan dan swasta diberikan kepada kaum India bagi tempoh 15 tahun akan datang.
   
7. Sekurang-kurangnya 20 orang Ahli Parlimen Pembangkang dilantik oleh masyarakat India.
   

Komen blogger:

Renungkan kesemua permintaan di atas dan bandingkan dengan keadaan sebenar di depan mata kita di Malaysia behubung kaum India yang hanya merangkumi 8 peratus daripada jumlah bilangan penduduk negara.

HINDRAF MINTA KERAJAAN BRITAIN BAWA KERAJAAN MALAYSIA KE MAHKAMAH DUNIA:

Dari blog Publius Melayu

Surat HINDRAF kepada Perdana Menteri Britain, Gordon Brown telah menuduh orang Melayu, terutama yang ada kuasa, membunuh kaum India secara sistematik.

Senangnya nak jadi rascist. Cuma perlu ada kelulusan undang-undang lantaran boleh bertopengkan sebagai lawyer dan buat pelbagai tuduhan perkauman. Ramai lawyer berbangsa India di negara kita belajar undang-undang Inggeris...malah ada juga lawyer Melayu yang berfikiran macam lawyer India. Entah apa penyakitnya mereka ni. Pengajian undang-undang ala barat banyak membawa masalah kepada orang Islam.

Macam-macam tuduhan di lemparkan terhadap orang Melayu, khusunya UMNO & kerajaan sekarang yang dikatakan di dominasi oleh Melayu. Mereka lupa kalau Malaysia turut mengikuti amalan demokrasi macam Singapura dan lain-lain, mereka langsung tidak akan ada suara atau tempat dalam kerajaan kerana mereka tidak ada kawasan majoriti (hanya 08% kalau nak ikut dakwaan mereka sendiri).

Soalannya, apakah kita boleh mempercayai bahawa Barat boleh menjadi wira mereka bagi membela dan menghakimi dakwaan ketidakadilan yang mereka lemparkan? Apakah hak Britain ke atas negara kita? Mengapa Britain? Kenapa tidak India? Agak pelik juga, kan? Kenapa, ya? Agaknya pada persepsi HINDRAF hanya kaum Anglo-Saxon yang terbukti telah menganaiya orang India sebelum negara India merdeka saja boleh berlaku adil dan bertamadun. Betul ke?

Cabaran kepada HINDRAF

Dipetik dari Blog Publius Melayu

i. Kalaulah HINDRAF ini cerdik sangat, apa kata kalau kita menjemput mereka berdebat bagi mengetahui betapa ceteknya kefahaman mereka terhadap maksud 'masyarakat majmuk' dan keperluan sosio-ekonomi di Malaysia.

ii. Mencabar HINDRAF untuk bertanding dalam pilihanraya yg akan datang. Dalam konteks ini, mencabar kerajaan yg memerintah bermaksud mencabar semua pengundi majoriti di pihak kerajaan yg berbilang kaum.

iii. Secalit kata berbau "perkauman", hukumnya WAJIB dikenakan tahanan ISA (itulah antara matlamat Akta ISA - public Interest prevails)

iv. Siarkan di semua rangkaian TV latar-belakang pemimpin HINDRAF yg pernah mendapat bantuan Kerajaan dalam berbagai bentuk secara langsung atau tidak sehingga mereka menjadi individu "cerdik" tapi intipatinya "Bodoh & Sombong"

v. Seluruh dunia mengagumi cara perjuangan MAHATMA GANDHI...dimana sebenarnya semangat itu pada kaum INDIA Malaysia?

The Bar Council just another ‘political’ party hijacking the feeble mind of young lawyers

From Publius Melayu Blog

If anyone comes up to me and say that lawyers stand up for justice, I'd not hesitate to rubbish them. Although the spirit of the law is all about honour, the lot (the very much saturated lot) of the legal fraternity in Malaysia is no different compared to the corrupted dregs of society.

I am disillussioned, long disilussioned with what these legal eagles stand up for in righting the perceived wrongs of the system, given the fact that they themselves are not beyond reproach.

In a stride we now see the Bar Council acting like a political party. It is obvious the movers and shakers within that hallowed institution is more inclined to push for their greedy political ideals than to carry out the honourable objectives of their profession.

Another issue that has long been of concerned among us is the blind dependence on English laws to provide for any lacuna in the country's laws. With such corrupted and blinkered mindset, it comes as no surprise to see the Bar Council constantly attacking the other legal instutions entrenched in Malaysia.

So taken are they by the ass that is English law that nothing else compares. They have closed their minds to the fact that the country's disparate societal make-up requires a very different legal mindset – one that must be based on the needs and acceptance of the target group.

Anwar Ibrahim uses people to carry out his evil intentions

From Publius Melayu Blog

The following comments were made recently by a former officer of The Institute for Policy Research, a think tank established by Anwar Ibrahim and headed by his protege, Khalid Jaafar:

"Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim uses people to realise his objectives. He is oblivious to whatever that happens to any of his supporters so long as they continue to agitate and rip assunder Malaysia's fragile social fabric.

Throughout the history of his defiance of social order, Anwar Ibrahim had caused a number of his supporters to fall and brought to book. The only consolation whenever this happened was to give nothing more than lip service.

The HINDRAF rally last week was yet another fine example of his cruel orchestrations. He encouraged, supported, and gave the ignorant participants Dutch courage to execute their deeds – deeds which were clearly against the law and provocative in nature.

This is the real Anwar Ibrahim..."

Alleged discrimination of minority Indians an excuse to stir racial sentiments

Extracted from Publius Melayu blog

So much was going around about the HINDRAF rally in several parts of Kuala Lumpur yesterday. It was a Sunday and it was natural for folks in the city to breakfast out for their dose of roti canai or thosai. Mid morning saw smses and phone calls trickling in to handphones updating on the commotion caused by the gathering HINDRAF supporters. Some of the messages were just bits of facts which soon took a life of its own to metamorphose into outright lies and unfounded rumours.

This blogger was at the scene at a location. Watched the whole thing and would hesitate to blame the police for their efforts to break-up the illegal assembly. They gave warnings after the several warnings on the run-up to the demonstration days before but to no avail. Many of the obvious thugs at the centre and on the edges of the groups could clearly be seen hurling abuses, profanities as well as lots of racialistic remarks. This had its desired effect on the rest. In a frenzy, they chanted and tried to lock hands to face the police.

What I saw was the police doing their work professionally. Try to be on their side and, perhaps, the demonstrators will think differently. Bystanders gawked at the melee with disgust. Not disgusted with the police but disgusted at the people who were obviously being used as pawns for some devious political ends.I adjourned to a kedai mamak soon after and overheard people loudly discussing the situation as though wanting everyone around to hear. One guy was Indian.

"Dont know if these guys realise that Indian votes dont count much in our elections because they are all on seats borrowed from the Malays...in India no new Mosque is allowed to be built so much so that in Mumbai Friday prayers are held twice or thrice in a mosque due to the sheer number of people that could not be accomodated within the premises...in Bali, Hindus just wrap sarongs around trunks of trees, which they believe have 'dewas'...they never build shrines or temples on the sites !

Back home in Malaysia, even illegally built suraus have been torned down. Democratic rights do not include ignoring the laws made by democratically elected representatives. If the Election Commission cheats, how come there are so many oppositions seats and one entire state run by an opposition party for 20 years? And how come PKR recently won a state seat in Sarawak?

Indians in Malaysia should very well practice some introspection as advocated by the Hindu religion instead of blaming others. In a multi-racial society, everyone should introspect! It is doubly dangerous if one blames only the others for one's problems. "

But, of course to the hot headed detractors, such an opinion coming from an Indian at that point in time would be seen as just a ploy orchestrated by the government – or that he was nothing more than an UMNO dog (in the usual lingo of the opposition) or an MIC stalwart...